Files
MeanField/experiments/N3_COMPATIBLE_FAMILY_2026-09-19.md

51 lines
2.9 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Explicit rotating n=3 physical-family control
Branch `research/n3-compatible-family-20260919`; parent `6d423cb`.
This changes experimental physical inputs, not solver equations or production
defaults. It must not be presented as a preconditioner speedup comparison.
The driver normally chooses K for a nonrotating mass-one Lane–Emden star.
The sharp gravitational-energy inequality and the steady virial identity
require, for n=3 and a nonnegative exact-EOS density,
beta = T/|W| <= [1 - (M_LE(K)/M)^(2/3)]/2.
At exactly M=M_LE(K), nonzero rotation is impossible. An independent DOP853
Lane–Emden integration with five tolerance/step/start controls gives the
actual driver's K=0.36393905995216302 a Lane–Emden mass
0.9999999918534539. Thus the numerical K is slightly on the permissible
side, but beta cannot exceed approximately 2.71552e-9. The control-to-control
mass spread is 1.95e-14; this is a numerical sensitivity observation, not a
rigorous interval enclosure. The intended moderate rotation cannot be reached
while retaining that essentially critical mass/K combination.
The optional experiment flag `--n3-K-factor f` multiplies K by a positive
factor, with index required to be exactly three when f differs from one.
The default is one. The analytic seed central density is multiplied by
f^(3/2), keeping its radius equal to the unchanged reference radius. Its
mass becomes approximately f^(3/2), while the target mass remains one.
This is a deliberately off-constraint initial guess, not a density rescaling
during Newton. The public EOS and independent density formulation are unchanged.
The seed's Bernoulli scalar continues to use the target mass; its discrepancy
is part of the initial nonlinear residual and is not hidden by this control.
The bounded first case uses f=.99, J=.035, no central border, the existing
gravity-Schur preconditioner and gravity-curvature trial path, 10 updates,
eta=.03 and absolute nonlinear target 1e-12. The necessary beta bound is then
0.00500000269. This does not guarantee existence, convergence, or identify
a fraction of critical rotation. J already breaks the nonrotating n=3
homology, so this case does not add an extra central-density phase condition.
The energy inequality's assumptions are not automatically satisfied by the
discrete independent rho/P(h) fields, approximate gravity, or a central
artificial forcing. This compatibility argument selects a sensible continuum
target; it is not a new density limiter or a substitute for numerical tests.
Primary source: Cheng, Cheng and Lin, equations (1.14)–(1.15) and Theorem 3.1,
[Expanding solutions near unstable Lane–Emden stars](https://arxiv.org/html/2305.10218#S3.SS1).
The displayed beta bound is our consequence of their inequality and
2T+W+3 integral(P)=0. Their G=1 convention matches this diagnostic.
Independent integration evidence is retained in
`../../diagnostics/n3_mass_compatibility_2026-09-19/`.