Clarify frozen endpoint scope and gravity target interpretation
This commit is contained in:
@@ -43,10 +43,19 @@ all 31 auxiliary gravity solves passed, but the final nonlinear residual was
|
||||
1/512. Every trial prepared successfully; all nineteen rejections were
|
||||
residual-decrease failures, and geometry never limited the step.
|
||||
|
||||
That campaign did not retain every raw Newton direction. The new late-state
|
||||
probe computes a fresh direction at its saved final endpoint; it does not
|
||||
claim to replay the preceding iteration's rejected trials. A plateau in a
|
||||
bounded twelve-step run is also not proof that all subsequent steps must
|
||||
fail. The fresh trial measurements can test that possibility.
|
||||
|
||||
The final squared-residual shares are approximately 42.42% hydrostatic,
|
||||
26.23% closure, 15.87% surface, 10.43% gravity, and 5.05% mass. This motivates
|
||||
examining retained-equation curvature after the gravity correction, rather
|
||||
than assuming the earlier gravity or pressure-preparation failure persists.
|
||||
The last auxiliary prepared defect, approximately 3.33e-14, measures agreement
|
||||
with the affine gravity target, not satisfaction of the gravity equations.
|
||||
The final gravity-block residual norm is approximately 4.51e-6.
|
||||
|
||||
Keep the complete physical equations, fixed normalization, optional
|
||||
central-density specification (absent here), mesh, and acceptance thresholds
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user