Emily Boudreaux
8dcdf92414
Instead of treating the polytrope as a free boundary problem I have defined an interpolating polynominal, accurate to within 0.01 percent over n=[0,5) which is used to set the size of the domain for a given n
42 lines
1.5 KiB
C++
42 lines
1.5 KiB
C++
#include <gtest/gtest.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <iostream>
|
|
|
|
#include "quill/LogMacros.h"
|
|
#include "mfem.hpp"
|
|
|
|
#include "polySolver.h"
|
|
#include "polyCoeff.h"
|
|
#include "probe.h"
|
|
#include "config.h"
|
|
#include "meshIO.h"
|
|
|
|
std::string CONFIG_FILENAME = std::string(getenv("MESON_SOURCE_ROOT")) + "/tests/testsConfig.yaml";
|
|
std::string SPHERICAL_MESH = std::string(getenv("MESON_SOURCE_ROOT")) + "/src/resources/mesh/core.msh";
|
|
|
|
class polyTest : public ::testing::Test {};
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(polyTest, Solve) {
|
|
Config& config = Config::getInstance();
|
|
config.loadConfig(CONFIG_FILENAME);
|
|
Probe::LogManager& logManager = Probe::LogManager::getInstance();
|
|
quill::Logger* logger = logManager.getLogger("log");
|
|
LOG_INFO(logger, "Starting polytrope solve test 1...");
|
|
config.loadConfig(CONFIG_FILENAME);
|
|
|
|
double polytropicIndex = config.get<double>("Tests:Poly:Index", 1);
|
|
double polyRadius = polycoeff::x1(polytropicIndex);
|
|
std::cout << "Polytropic index: " << polytropicIndex << std::endl;
|
|
std::cout << "Polytropic radius: " << polyRadius << std::endl;
|
|
LOG_INFO(logger, "Solving polytrope with n = {:0.2f}", polytropicIndex);
|
|
MeshIO meshIO(SPHERICAL_MESH, polyRadius);
|
|
mfem::Mesh& mesh = meshIO.GetMesh();
|
|
double radius = Probe::getMeshRadius(mesh);
|
|
LOG_INFO(logger, "Mesh radius: {:0.4f} (target={:0.4f})", radius, polyRadius);
|
|
|
|
|
|
PolySolver polytrope(polytropicIndex, 1, mesh);
|
|
LOG_INFO(logger, "Solving polytrope...");
|
|
EXPECT_NO_THROW(polytrope.solve());
|
|
LOG_INFO(logger, "Polytrope solved.");
|
|
} |