Emily Boudreaux
6b57738330
Note for now much of the docs is LLM written. This was done to save time and focus on code development. The docs have been LOOSLEY reviewed. However, the code itself has been either fully written by hand or fully reviewed. Therefore, the docs should at the moment be seen as a loose resource rather than authoratiative (and this is on top of the general ability for docs to drift)
36 lines
1.2 KiB
Groff
36 lines
1.2 KiB
Groff
.TH "serif::model::SpecificationBackendAvailable" 3 "Version v0.0.1a" "SERiF" \" -*- nroff -*-
|
|
.ad l
|
|
.nh
|
|
.SH NAME
|
|
serif::model::SpecificationBackendAvailable \- Require a registered implementation for every declared generated derivative, including explicit zeros\&.
|
|
|
|
.SH SYNOPSIS
|
|
.br
|
|
.PP
|
|
.PP
|
|
\fR#include <validation\&.hpp>\fP
|
|
.SH "Concept definition"
|
|
.PP
|
|
|
|
.nf
|
|
template<typename Model, typename Values, typename Rows, typename DeclaredCouplings, typename ImplementedCouplings, typename Bindings DefaultSpecificationBindings>
|
|
concept serif::model::SpecificationBackendAvailable = SpecificationTopologyValid<Model, Values, Rows, DeclaredCouplings, Bindings> &&
|
|
SpecificationTopologyValid<Model, Values, Rows, ImplementedCouplings, Bindings>
|
|
.PP
|
|
.fi
|
|
.SH "Detailed Description"
|
|
.PP
|
|
Require a registered implementation for every declared generated derivative, including explicit zeros\&.
|
|
|
|
|
|
.PP
|
|
\fBNote\fP
|
|
.RS 4
|
|
ImplementedCouplings must come from admitted providers\&. Missing methods never imply zero; this checks specification contributions only, leaving the equation backend's own execution contract independent\&.
|
|
.RE
|
|
.PP
|
|
|
|
.SH "Author"
|
|
.PP
|
|
Generated automatically by Doxygen for SERiF from the source code\&.
|